<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/www.openlinksw.com/data/turtle/general/virtuoso-general-faq-2023.ttl> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/urn/data:openlink:websites> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>	<http://schema.org/Answer> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://schema.org/name>	"Answer to question: What is the differences in terms of performance/scalability between 2 cluster configurations?"@en .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/urn/mdata:websites:google:seo> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<http://oplussol11.intranet.openlinksw.com:8890/about/id/entity/urn/webdev:virtuoso> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/urn/data:openlink:products> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/https/virtuoso.openlinksw.com/data/turtle/general/virtuoso-faq.ttl> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://schema.org/answerExplanation>	"Configuration A:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 1 instance per host cluster node, 12 host cluster nodes.  \n\nConfiguration B:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 4 instances per host cluster node, 3 host cluster nodes.  \n\nPerformance has more to do with the number of Virtuoso Server processes running on each cluster node.  One instance per cluster node will work better than four instances per cluster node.  You will have more OS resources available as the Virtuoso instances are reduced.  Ideally, you want to spread the instances over distinct machines so that you have resources pooled across those machines." .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/urn/virtuoso:web:faqs> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://schema.org/answerExplanation>	"Configuration A:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 1 instance per host cluster node, 12 host cluster nodes.  \n\nConfiguration B:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 4 instances per host cluster node, 3 host cluster nodes.  \n\nPerformance has more to do with the number of Virtuoso Server processes running on each cluster node.  One instance per cluster node will work better than four instances per cluster node.  You will have more OS resources available as the Virtuoso instances are reduced.  Ideally, you want to spread the instances over distinct machines so that you have resources pooled across those machines."@en .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.openlinksw.com/ontology/faq#hasAnswerText>	"Configuration A:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 1 instance per host cluster node, 12 host cluster nodes.  \n\nConfiguration B:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 4 instances per host cluster node, 3 host cluster nodes.  \n\nPerformance has more to do with the number of Virtuoso Server processes running on each cluster node.  One instance per cluster node will work better than four instances per cluster node.  You will have more OS resources available as the Virtuoso instances are reduced.  Ideally, you want to spread the instances over distinct machines so that you have resources pooled across those machines." .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://schema.org/name>	"Answer to question: What is the differences in terms of performance/scalability between 2 cluster configurations?" .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby>	<https://www.openlinksw.com/about/id/entity/urn/webdev:virtuoso> .
<http://data.openlinksw.com/oplweb/faq/Virtuoso/ClusterConfigDifAnswer#this>	<http://schema.org/answerExplanation>	"Configuration A:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 1 instance per host cluster node, 12 host cluster nodes.  \r\n\r\nConfiguration B:  4 cluster nodes, 3 instances per cluster node (quorum), 4 instances per host cluster node, 3 host cluster nodes.  \r\n\r\nPerformance has more to do with the number of Virtuoso Server processes running on each cluster node.  One instance per cluster node will work better than four instances per cluster node.  You will have more OS resources available as the Virtuoso instances are reduced.  Ideally, you want to spread the instances over distinct machines so that you have resources pooled across those machines." .